Essentially, an Alford plea recognizes that the prosecution has the evidence to support a conviction, but the defendant does not admit guilt. Blackmon, 6th Dist. Henry C. Alford was on trial for first-degree murder and insisted that he was innocent, despite three witnesses who said they heard him say he was going to kill the victim, that he got a … Lucas No. Given the unusual circumstances thanks to the pandemic with Sermon unavailable to travel for visits, those previous ties to Alford and the memories of two unofficial trips to Ohio State in high school actually wound up being pretty significant. See all articles by Michael Conklin Michael Conklin.
Better stated, it’s a kind of guilty plea, one that shares similarities with the “no contest” plea. State v. Marcum, Columbiana App. Defendants who enter Alford pleas would rather just enter a plea than put everyone through the trouble of a trial that will probably return a guilty verdict. The court treats it as a guilty plea." He/she continues to assert that, to the best of his/her knowledge, he/she is innocent of the crimes that he/she is being charged with. How Attorney Experience and Defendant Background Affect Plea Bargaining, ___ OHIO ST. J. CRIM. Typically, it results in a guilty plea of a lesser crime (i.e. State v. Schmidt, 3d Dist. An Ohio man has entered a plea to charges in the death of his girlfriend's 11-month-old son and faces decades in state prison. No. 10-10-04, 2010-Ohio-4809, ¶13. Alford, where the defendant was allowed to enter a guilty plea while still maintaining innocence. The following is an incomplete list of notable individuals that have entered an Alford plea.An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea and Alford doctrine) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, where the defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence.
An Alford plea isn’t the same as a guilty plea—it is a guilty plea.
To be more precise, an Alford plea is a guilty plea by a defendant who claims to be innocent. 10-25, 2011-Ohio-1998, ¶ 5 (“Carey now asserts that her ‘protestations of innocence’ meant that her plea was actually an ‘Alford plea.’ Therefore, Carey contends that the trial court erred when it accepted her plea without conducting an enhanced inquiry in order to determine that her plea was voluntarily and intelligently made.”). The Alford plea is slightly controversial, as it is not technically a declaration of innocence or an admission of guilt. By taking an Alford plea, defendants never have to admit they are guilty. Origin of the Plea TOLEDO, Ohio (AP) — An Ohio woman who won a new trial after being sentenced to life in prison for convincing her 10-year-old adopted son to kill his father entered a plea to lesser charges. TOLEDO, Ohio – An Ohio woman who won a new trial after being sentenced to life in prison for convincing her 10-year-old adopted son to kill his father entered a plea to lesser charges. second degree murder rather than first).